I have found that most people are either tuned one of two ways in regards to their calendars.
They either subscribe to the Gregorian calendar (our present day 12-month calendar starting in January) or to a School Year calendar (approximately starting in September and ending in June). I am tuned into the school calendar even though it has been awhile since I was last in school.
It used to be tradition that the schools would reopen after the Labor Day weekend. However, that has not been the case so much universally anymore for quite some time.
What am I rambling on about this time you ask?
Well it is not even early September, but the schools all seem to be in full session now including most of the Universities & Colleges.
Which all brings my mind back to the recollection of an all time favorite illustration. Yes, I am sure you have all seen and are familiar with it.
The famous spanking cover of National Lampoon in 1975, painted by Birney Lettick.
Before I share a few thoughts on this illustration, I have a secret to share.
Yes. A secret.
I have never really been into the particular SchoolGirl fantasy as specifically portrayed in explicit videos.
No, not really.
Shocked?! Don’t be.
Honestly in general that specific emphasis on that part of the fantasy rubs me the wrong way and is just a big turn off when done up too much. I won’t elaborate, but I think you can figure out what I am getting at without going into detail.
You might be saying,
“Enzo, but you know very well those models in those videos are not underage!”
Yes, of course, but depends where you are sourcing your images and videos. Some sites (not so much the spanking related ones) try real hard to make the models appear terribly young… No thank you.
“Enzo, you know very well school girls don’t wear heels!”
Yes, also obvious; so credit to those producers who don’t go for the total underage vibe, but some of those tend to run into the extreme other issue. The issue of extreme disbelief. The makeup, the heels and all the over the top accessories that end up being almost reminiscent of an ‘80 hair band video.
(Note that this is not an all encompassing summation of my tastes. Have I played with Littles and do I enjoy that? Yes, but again that isn't quite the same to me as what some of those explicit videos are implying.)
Now don’t get me wrong - I obviously love a woman in a short skirt, pleated and plaid all the better. Demoted to a school uniform, icing.
But I’d rather the fantasy be played out in any number of alternate ways than what seems popular consensus.
For one, at a college level, which still is not correct, but at least it is strictly adults involved.
Do you follow my rationale?
So if you haven’t clicked off this page after this revelation allow me to share my thoughts on our featured illustration.
I find this image a lot more to my taste based on the implied ages. (Call me a hypocrite if you will, but having two adults as I said is a lot easier for me.)
On the reality of this published artwork, I enjoy it because I still find it hard to believe that it was published in a mainstream magazine - on the cover no less! Now since I wasn’t around at the time of this publication, someone who was can correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t believe this magazine was hidden from sight as would be the adult magazines. Imagine the happy surprise to generally any curious eyes and no doubt to spankers.
This cover art has our hero, the Professor, not only spanking the hard-headed Coed, but he has taken things further. Not only has he pulled up her skirt, he has yanked down her panties and is punishing her bare bottom! Again I am (happily) surprised this was on the cover. I would imagine the artist being told that illustration would have to show her with her panties in their upright position - and even that on the cover would seem risque to me for the time.
The illustration itself is excellent in my opinion. It is to the caliber of Norman Rockwell and the artist, Lettick, I believe was intentionally setting it up as such making it that much more appealing. He could have done a flatter image, a simpler angle, and ignored the details, but he did not. All the details as any Rockwell would include are there, from his pipe to his wool suit and from her wool skirt to her argyle socks.
Plus, I love all the clever details including the use of a slide-ruler (rather than a plain ruler) to emphasize she has failed Calculus II as noted on her test sheet. Plus his instructions on said test sheet. All excellent.
So there you have it.
I found large size illustrations for your detailed analyzing and viewing pleasure. Just click on the last two images for the larger size images. Enjoy.
Let me know your thoughts overall and on this illustration in particular. Would love to hear them. Are you a fan or is it simply troublesome for you?